Skip to main content
David L. Cohen, P.C.
(646) 705-0739
David L. Cohen, P.C.
  • Home
  • About
    • How We Work
    • Publications
  • Legal Services
    • Non-Disclosure Agreements
    • Litigation Management (Global or Otherwise)
    • Patent Law
    • Outside Counsel Management
    • Licensing
    • Patent Litigation
  • Kidon Services
  • Resources
    • Podcast
    • Blog
  • Contact
    • Make a Payment
  • Newsletter Signup
Home > Sitemap
  • Home
  • About
    • How We Work
    • Publications
  • Legal Services
    • Non-Disclosure Agreements
    • Patent Prosecution Attorney in New York City
    • Patent Licensing Attorney in New York City
    • Litigation Funding Attorney in New York City
    • Litigation Management (Global or Otherwise)
    • Patent Law
    • Outside Counsel Management
    • Licensing
    • Patent Litigation
  • Kidon Services
  • Resources
    • Podcast
    • Blog
      • Outsourced In-House Counsel – The case of Standard Essential Patent Assertion
      • Outsourcing In-House Counsel: The Case of Litigation Management
      • Outsourcing In-House Counsel: The Case of Trade Secret Services
      • Outsourcing In-House Counsel: IP Department Creation
      • Outsourced Manufacturing and Trade Secrets: Contractual Trade Secret Protection Measures (Part 9)
      • Outsourced Manufacturing and Trade Secrets: Controlling the Manufacturing Process (Part 8)
      • Outsourced Manufacturing and Trade Secrets: Manufacturing Process & Personnel (Part 7)
      • Outsourced Manufacturing and Trade Secrets: Internal Controls (Part 4)
      • Outsourced Manufacturing and Trade Secrets: The Manufacturer Relationship (Part 10)
      • Response to the USPTO, The ITA, and NIST call for Public Comments on Standards, Part 1 of 7
      • A Short History of Vringo’s Battle with ZTE
      • Response to the USPTO, The ITA, and NIST call for Public Comments on Standards, Part 2 of 7
      • Response to the USPTO, The ITA, and NIST call for Public Comments on Standards, Part 3 of 7
      • Response to the USPTO, The ITA, and NIST call for Public Comments on Standards, Part 4 of 7
      • Response to the USPTO, The ITA, and NIST call for Public Comments on Standards, Part 6 of 7
      • The IEEE Ill-Advised 2015 IP Policy Continues to Fail
      • Response to the USPTO, The ITA, and NIST call for Public Comments on Standards, Part 7 of 7
      • David L. Cohen Named As World-Leading IP Strategist
      • Meet the IP Thought Leaders: Eric M. Sarver, Esq.
      • Meet the IP Thought Leaders: Ozer M. N. Teitelbaum
      • Kidon Podcast: War Stories on the Cutting Edge of IP Monetization – David Cohen and Chris Colvin
      • Kidon Podcast: IP War Stories – David Cohen & Dragos Vilau
      • Outsourced Manufacturing and Trade Secrets: Due Diligence (Part 5)
      • Outsourced Manufacturing and Trade Secrets: Transaction Structure & Contract (Part 6)
      • Meet the IP Thought Leaders: Donal O’Connell
      • Meet the IP Thought Leaders: Eric Stasik
      • Meet the IP Thought Leaders: Robert Colao
      • Outsourced Manufacturing and Trade Secrets: Final Considerations
      • Outsourced Manufacturing and Trade Secrets: Security Procedures for Access, Storage, and Transmission (Part 12)
      • Outsourcing In-House Counsel: The Case of Litigation Management
      • Response to the US Department of Justice call for Public Comments on SEPs Part 2 of 6
      • Response to the US Department of Justice call for Public Comments on SEPs Part 3 of 6
      • With SEP Politics Eagle Eyes are Needed, or Senator Tillis’ Watchfulness Pays Off and Comments on the Draft Policy Statement Now Due February 4
      • Tech’s Frightful Five and Their Allies Come to Brussels
      • The SEP Royalty Stacking Myth – Apple Calls Its Own Bluff
      • Anti-Patent Leadership Taking IEEE-SA on The Road to Knowhere? Part I
      • Response to the US Department of Justice call for Public Comments on SEPs Part 4 of 6
      • A Short History of Vringo’s Battle with ZTE
      • Trade Secret Audits – Why Bother?
      • Trade Secrets: What Are They Worth?
      • Worthwhile Upcoming Trade Secret Workshop
      • Response to the US Department of Justice call for Public Comments on SEPs Part 1 of 6
      • Response to the US Department of Justice call for Public Comments on SEPs Part 5 of 6
      • Response to the US Department of Justice call for Public Comments on SEPs Part 6 of 6
      • The ACT | APPLE Association Charade
      • The Real Empty Suit? Unified Patent’s Reverse Trolling Take 2
      • Apple Throws an Ally under the Bus Again – The Case of the IEEE
      • The DOJ Antitrust Division: Regulatory Capture at the Expense of U.S. Interests
      • Commentary and Concerns About the European Commission’s Proposed Regulation of SEP Licensing
      • Biden Administration Provides Guidance on Remedies for FRAND-Assured SEPs Levels the Playing Field against Big Tech and China
      • Regulatory Capture Crosses the Atlantic [UPDATED]
      • Updated Practice Note on SEP Licensing Management
      • Outsourced Manufacturing and Trade Secrets: Obligations Concerning Manufacturer’s Employees and Contractors (Part 11)
      • Response to the USPTO, The ITA, and NIST call for Public Comments on Standards, Part 5 of 7
      • On Deceptive Apps and Practices: Unmasking the ACT App(le) Association
      • Cars or Car-tels?
      • Disclosures and Enforceability of Standard-Essential Patents: An Overview
      • Technical Standards: A Quick Introduction [VIDEO]
      • Implementer Subterfuge Comes to Japan
      • A Patent: What Is In It? [VIDEO]
      • The Patent Litigation Money Pit
      • SEP Litigation Trends and Licensing Realities
      • Strengthen Your Intellectual Assets (Part 2): Structured Innovation
      • IEEE and ANSI Reach Agreement to Conceal Negative Letters of Assurance
      • Strengthen Your Intellectual Assets (Part 1): IP Audits
      • A Compulsory “License to All” World: A Counter-Factual Exercise
      • Wi-Fi Negative Letters of Assurance Contaminate and Compromise ISO 8802 Standards
      • A Quick Reading Comprehension Exercise
      • Efficient Infringer Smacked by the EDVA – Will the Federal Circuit Finally Draw a Line in the Sand?
      • The Six Stages of Trade Secret Misappropriation Protection
      • The Department of Justice Affirms End Device Licensing – The Avanci 5G Licensing Business Review Letter
      • Apple’s CORE Hypocrisy – Setting a World Record in Late Disclosure
      • The Real FRAND Scam Part 1
      • The Real FRAND Scam Part 2
      • The Real FRAND Scam Part 3
      • Identifying Trade Secrets With Reasonable Particularity
      • Identifying Trade Secrets With Reasonable Particularity (Continued)
      • IPlytics’ Patent-Counting Fallacy
      • Back to Balance
      • Employees or Independent Contractor Generated IP
      • The IEEE 2015 Patent Policy – A Natural Experiment in Devaluing Technology
      • Reasonable Steps and Trade Secret Protection
      • The Value of a Confidentiality Agreement
      • The Value of a Confidentiality Agreement…Continued
      • IP Monetization: 4 Categories for Consideration
      • Trade Secret Theft in China
      • A Rotten Apple Standard
      • HR and Trade Secret Asset Management
      • What is a Trade Secret Audit and Why Get One?
      • Outsourced Manufacturing and Trade Secrets: An Economic Overview (Part 1)
      • Outsourced Manufacturing and Trade Secrets: Outsourced Manufacturing (Part 2)
      • Outsourced Manufacturing and Trade Secrets: Risks & Benefits (Part 3)
      • Unified Patent’s UnFRANDly Jihad or Trolling at the PTAB
      • Failure to Take “Reasonable Measures” to Protect Secrecy Precludes Trade Secret Protection
      • Smallest Saleable Patent Practicing Unit (SSPPU) – Another Court Affirms the Obvious
      • Patent Demand Letters – You Have One, What Now? (Part 1)
      • Patent Demand Letters – The Kinds of Letters You Might Receive (Part 2)
      • Patent Demand Letters – Immediate Steps You Can Take (Part 3)
      • Patent Demand Letters – Response Tactics (Part 4)
      • Patent Demand Letters – Escalation or Litigation (Part 5)
      • Standard Essential Patents and Antitrust Law
      • The Importance of Trade Secret Metadata at a Trade Secret Misappropriation Court Case
      • The Importance of Trade Secret Metadata at a Trade Secret Misappropriation Court Case (Part 2)
      • Will the IoT Patent Wars be like the Smartphone Wars?
      • Will the IoT Patent Wars be like the Smartphone Wars? Part 2
      • Designing and Deploying a Trade Secret Service
      • NEWS ALERT: IEEE gamesmanship over FRAND (again)
      • Recent Edits to the IEEE IPR Policy are Steps in the Right Direction
      • ISO Halts Processing of IEEE Standards in the Aftermath of its Patent Policy
      • 5th Circuit’s Continental v. Avanci Decision Endorses “Access-to-all”, rejects compulsory “license-to-all”
      • Apple’s Well-Funded Efficient Infringement Tilts the Competitive Landscape
      • A Reckoning for Automotive Holdouts? or Are SEP Holders Getting Fed Up?
      • New Empirical Data Demonstrates Continued Failure of IEEE 2015 Patent Policy
      • Legal Protection for the Software Arts — Part 1
      • Legal Protection for the Software Arts — Part 2
      • Legal Protection for the Software Arts — Part 3
      • Legal Protection for the Software Arts — Part 4
      • Legal Protection for the Software Arts — Part 5
      • Legal Protection for the Software Arts — Part 6
      • Legal Protection for the Software Arts — Part 7
      • Legal Protection for the Software Arts — Part 8
      • Legal Protection for the Software Arts — Part 9
      • Legal Protection for the Software Arts — Part 10
      • Understanding a Technology Transfer
  • Contact
    • Make a Payment
  • Legal Notices

Get in Touch


New York, NY
10025
(646) 705-0739
Sun Closed
Mon 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
Tue 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
Wed 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
Thu 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
Fri 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
Sat Closed

Get Directions
Leave a Review

Get in Touch

Error!
Your message has failed. Please try again.
  • © 2025 David L. Cohen, P.C.
  • Sitemap
  • Disclaimer