FRAND
Response to the USPTO, The ITA, and NIST call for Public Comments on Standards, Part 7 of 7
Response to the USPTO, The ITA, and NIST call for Public Comments on Standards, Part 7 of 7
On November 6, 2023 I submitted a response to the public comments which can be found here. I have also included my comments in full on this blog in a series of posts including the below.
Response to the USPTO, The ITA, and NIST call for Public Comments on Standards, Part 4 of 7
Response to the USPTO, The ITA, and NIST call for Public Comments on Standards, Part 4 of 7
On November 6, 2023 I submitted a response to the public comments which can be found here. I have also included my comments in full on this blog in a series of posts including the below. Standards; FRAND; SEP; patentlicensing; standards; SDO; globalstandards
Response to the USPTO, The ITA, and NIST call for Public Comments on Standards, Part 3 of 7
Response to the USPTO, The ITA, and NIST call for Public Comments on Standards, Part 3 of 7
On November 6, 2023 I submitted a response to the public comments which can be found here. I have also included my comments in full on this blog in a series of posts including the below. Standards; FRAND; SEP; patentlicensing; standards; SDO; globalstandards
Response to the USPTO, The ITA, and NIST call for Public Comments on Standards, Part 2 of 7
Response to the USPTO, The ITA, and NIST call for Public Comments on Standards, Part 2 of 7
On November 6, 2023 I submitted a response to the public comments which can be found here. I have also included my comments in full on this blog in a series of posts including the below.
Commentary and Concerns About the European Commission’s Proposed Regulation of SEP Licensing
Commentary and Concerns About the European Commission’s Proposed Regulation of SEP Licensing
This Summer, the European Commission asked for comments on the proposed regulations that are wending their way through the European Parliament (see, e.g.)